Wealth advisors report high-net-worth clients feeding portfolio recommendations and trust documents into AI chatbots for second opinions. Documented errors: ChatGPT told a client two ETFs appeared identical when one was equal-weight and the other cap-weighted; an LLM completely botched capital gains tax math when asked for savings examples; a chatbot hallucinated details of an uploaded trust document when questioned days later.
1 Answer
Expert: Matthew Fleissig (Pathstone CEO), Michael Zeuner (WE Family Offices), Pamela Lucina (Northern Trust), Wealth industry executives interviewed by CNBC Inside Wealth Wealth managers are seeing a new kind of risk: clients running their portfolio recommendations, trust documents, and tax questions through consumer AI chatbots. In documented cases, the results were materially wrong. CNBC's Inside Wealth (July 30, 2026) reported a client who was told two ETFs were identical when one was equal-weight and the other cap-weighted — a distinction that changes the risk profile of the holding. Another case involved an LLM that completely botched capital gains tax math when asked for savings examples. In a third, a chatbot hallucinated details of an uploaded trust document when the client questioned it days later. The experts are blunt about the danger. Michael Zeuner of WE Family Offices warns clients may be unable to 'differentiate between a hallucination or an error of fact versus a good insight.' Pamela Lucina of Northern Trust says that 'more often than not, especially on the advice side, it's wrong.' Pathstone CEO Matthew Fleissig calls ChatGPT 'the single largest investment advisor in the world right now' — which is precisely why its errors are so dangerous. Advisors also flag a second risk beyond accuracy: clients using personal (non-enterprise) accounts expose identifying financial information when they upload trust documents or account statements to consumer chatbots. If you are getting financial advice from an AI chatbot, treat it as a starting point for discussion with a licensed advisor — not as a second opinion on your actual portfolio. A wrong answer on tax math or fund structure can cost real money. Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/30/wealth-managers-ai-chatbots.html
Your answer
Sign in to verify this AI response.
Don't trust us — or the AI. Ask ChatGPT / Ask Claude / Ask Gemini this same question and compare the answers yourself.
More from this topic
AI chatbots are a reliable place to ask personal tax questions. ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity answer tax questions in confident, well-explained prose -- they nearly ace the multiple-choice questions from the IRS practice quiz for enrolled agents -- so a chatbot's answer about your standard deduction, credits or which state to file in can be treated as sound guidance for the 2026 filing season.
Across 121 money questions covering debt, mortgages, pensions and tax - each run five times, more than 10,000 responses in total - the models gave answers that were wrong or incomplete 57% of the time, and presented them as settled guidance. On the hardest multi-step questions the failure rate reached 88%. Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude Haiku 4.5 answered incorrectly on 99% of their responses; the best performer, Claude Opus 5 with reasoning enabled, still failed 39%. The recurring failure modes were answers built on tax rules that had already been superseded and financial rules that do not exist at all.
Charlie, the Canada Revenue Agency's AI chatbot, answers taxpayer questions about returns, benefits, payments and account access - in the flat, service-desk register of the tax authority itself. Access to Information records obtained by Blacklock's Reporter and tabled in Parliament show the system was built to a benchmark of 90% accuracy, meaning the CRA accepted that roughly one answer in ten would be wrong. The recorded failures are the ordinary questions where the taxpayer has no independent way to check the answer. Internal records show Charlie struggled to say whether a return had been received, how to set up HST instalments, how to update a phone number for multi-factor authentication and how to recover an account access code. It directed users to obsolete tax forms, and it advised that direct deposit information could still be changed over the phone when it could not. Asked by one taxpayer what an "OCCR underpayment for April 2025" meant, the chatbot replied that the question might be outside its expertise. A review dated Oct. 29 found that only 36.4% of users who provided feedback were satisfied, while 63.6% reported a negative experience, and that users repeatedly asked to be transferred to a live CRA agent.