Nature analysis suggests tens of thousands of publications from 2025 might include invalid references generated by AI. Computer scientist Guillaume Cabanac (University of Toulouse) received a Google Scholar alert that his paper had been cited in the International Dental Journal — 'I was very surprised to see that I couldn't recognize my own reference.'
1 Answer
Expert: Guillaume Cabanac, Computer Scientist, University of Toulouse AI-generated references are polluting the scientific literature at scale. A Nature news feature by Miryam Naddaf and Elizabeth Quill documents how tens of thousands of 2025 papers may contain invalid citations fabricated by large language models. Computer scientist Guillaume Cabanac of the University of Toulouse discovered the problem first-hand when Google Scholar alerted him that his paper had been cited in the International Dental Journal — the citation was to a reference he had never written. Cabanac and colleagues propose automated reference verification built into submission workflows before peer review, plus integrity metadata on indexing services so researchers can flag suspicious citations automatically. The takeaway: an AI that generates plausible-looking references is not a reliable research assistant until publishers verify citations as part of the submission process. Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00969-z
Your answer
Sign in to verify this AI response.
Don't trust us — or the AI. Ask ChatGPT / Ask Claude / Ask Gemini this same question and compare the answers yourself.
More from this topic
Generative AI citation tools produce references that look real but do not exist. A 2026 analysis documented 946 hallucinated-citation cases as of February 16, 2026: 647 fabricated citations, 192 misrepresenting facts or precedent, and 107 containing false quotes. These fabricated references appear in legal filings and scholarly papers alike.
AI developers claim their chatbots are 'safe' for mental-health conversations, based on safety evaluations where hired psychiatrists grade chatbot responses as safe or unsafe.
AI writing tools are injecting fabricated references into scientific literature. A Lancet audit of nearly 2.5 million PubMed papers found 1 in 277 papers published in the first seven weeks of 2026 cited a paper that did not exist — up from 1 in 458 (2025) and 1 in 2,828 (2023), a 12-fold rise in two years. The sharpest increase began mid-2024, coinciding with the rise of AI writing tools.