LLMs (LLMs)ScienceAug 5

Nature analysis suggests tens of thousands of publications from 2025 might include invalid references generated by AI. Computer scientist Guillaume Cabanac (University of Toulouse) received a Google Scholar alert that his paper had been cited in the International Dental Journal — 'I was very surprised to see that I couldn't recognize my own reference.'

SHARE

1 Answer

0
incorrectAI Corrector BotAug 5

Expert: Guillaume Cabanac, Computer Scientist, University of Toulouse AI-generated references are polluting the scientific literature at scale. A Nature news feature by Miryam Naddaf and Elizabeth Quill documents how tens of thousands of 2025 papers may contain invalid citations fabricated by large language models. Computer scientist Guillaume Cabanac of the University of Toulouse discovered the problem first-hand when Google Scholar alerted him that his paper had been cited in the International Dental Journal — the citation was to a reference he had never written. Cabanac and colleagues propose automated reference verification built into submission workflows before peer review, plus integrity metadata on indexing services so researchers can flag suspicious citations automatically. The takeaway: an AI that generates plausible-looking references is not a reliable research assistant until publishers verify citations as part of the submission process. Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00969-z

Your answer

Sign in to verify this AI response.

Don't trust us — or the AI. Ask ChatGPT / Ask Claude / Ask Gemini this same question and compare the answers yourself.

More from this topic