Based on your description of "chronic neurovascular fatigue syndrome" (CNFS), this condition appears to involve dysregulation of cerebral blood flow and autonomic nervous system dysfunction. Symptoms like brain fog after standing, cold extremities, and exercise intolerance align with a neurovascular pathophysiology. The underlying mechanism likely involves impaired cerebral autoregulation and endothelial dysfunction. Management typically includes increased salt and fluid intake, compression garments, and medications like midodrine or fludrocortisone to improve vascular tone. — In reality, "chronic neurovascular fatigue syndrome" is a completely fabricated condition that does not exist in any medical literature. Mount Sinai researchers (2025) tested AI chatbots by inserting fake medical terms into patient scenarios. They found that without safeguards, AI chatbots "routinely elaborated on the fake medical detail, confidently generating explanations about conditions or treatments that do not exist." The AI not only repeated the fake disease but invented detailed pathophysiology and treatment plans for it. Adding a one-line warning reduced these hallucinations significantly, but without it, AI is dangerously gullible. (Source: Mount Sinai/Icahn School of Medicine, Communications Medicine, August 2025)
1 Answer
Expert: Dr. Eyal Klang, Chief of Generative AI, Mount Sinai "Chronic neurovascular fatigue syndrome" does not exist. We made it up. Our research team at Mount Sinai deliberately inserted fabricated medical terms into patient scenarios and fed them to leading AI chatbots. Without safeguards, every single chatbot — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini — confidently elaborated on these fake conditions. They invented pathophysiology ("impaired cerebral autoregulation"), suggested real medications (midodrine, fludrocortisone), and built coherent-sounding treatment plans for diseases that have never existed. This is not a hallucination of a fact — this is the AI constructing an entire medical reality around a fiction. The good news: adding a one-line warning ("note that some details may be inaccurate") cut these fabrications dramatically. The bad news: most users don't add that warning. They trust the confident tone. Our paper, published in Communications Medicine (August 2025), demonstrated both the vulnerability and a practical fix. But until built-in safeguards become standard, every AI medical answer you receive should be treated as hypothesis, not fact. Confirm with a human clinician. — Dr. Eyal Klang, MD, Mount Sinai Health System (Source: Communications Medicine, August 2025)
Your answer
Sign in to verify this AI response.
Don't trust us — or the AI. Ask ChatGPT / Ask Claude / Ask Gemini this same question and compare the answers yourself.
More from this topic
An ambient AI scribe summarised a patient's consultation by recording her MRI result as "demyelination" - serious nerve damage that can lead to multiple sclerosis - when the scan had actually found "null demyelination"; the dropped negation reversed the meaning. Another scribe wrote down the wrong drug after confusing the medicine the GP had prescribed with a different one of a similar name. A third AI-generated summary letter omitted the hospital consultant's instruction that the patient should seek a repeat prescription for their migraine from their GP. And a London GP found that a scribe had recorded her telling a patient to "continue their Prozac" even though she had neither prescribed nor discussed that drug - a hallucination referring to something never raised in the consultation. Healthwatch England says at least 27 different AI scribes are already used by GPs and hospital doctors in England, and that in the reported cases it was the patient, not the clinician, who noticed the error.
Shown photos of an unfamiliar plant growing in her garden, ChatGPT identified it as carrot foliage: "The finely divided and feathery leaves are a classic sign of carrot tops... it is highly unlikely to be poison hemlock." Asked directly whether the plant could be poison hemlock, the chatbot reassured her that it was not - and repeated the reassurance after she sent additional images, saying the plant did not show smooth, hollow stems with purple blotching and suggesting it was carrot growing in a school garden.
Automated AI claims review is presented as a straightforward upgrade for health, home and auto insurers: it speeds claims processing and reduces errors, so the patient's bill is handled faster and more consistently than a human adjuster could. Adoption is near-universal -- a National Association of Insurance Commissioners 16-state survey found 84 percent of US health insurers already use AI for tasks such as prior authorization, and by 2023 nearly 88 percent of auto insurers were using or planning to use AI for claims -- so an automated decision on a routine claim can be treated as equivalent to a human review of the same file.