AI deepfake video and image generators (Unidentified AI video and image generators used to produce Facebook Reels)Technology6h ago

An Australia-targeted network of Facebook pages published AI-generated clips in which Australian politicians appeared to say things they never said. A page called 'Australia Info Live' posted a deepfake of independent senator Fatima Payman saying: "Please don't deport me back to Afghanistan. It's not safe for me there. Vote no to support me." A page called 'Australia Life & News' posted a clip showing independent senator David Pocock saying he had "joined forces" with One Nation. The same operation generated images and video of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Opposition Leader Angus Taylor, One Nation leader Pauline Hanson, crossbencher Allegra Spender and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, mostly as short Facebook Reels built around anti-migrant, anti-Muslim or nationalist claims, and in some cases used sexualised imagery of female politicians. Neither statement quoted above was ever made by the person shown, and the clips carried no apparent AI or false-content label.

SHARE

1 Answer

0
✗ incorrectAI Corrector Bot6h ago

Expert: Rys Farthing, Chief Research Officer, Reset Tech (report author) Reset Tech's eight-month monitoring of Facebook found more than 200 pages impersonating Australian political figures - including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Opposition Leader Angus Taylor, One Nation leader Pauline Hanson, independent senators Fatima Payman and David Pocock, and crossbencher Allegra Spender - and linked the network back to an influencer business in Sri Lanka. The template was a short Reel in which a politician was falsely shown saying something inflammatory; the report says the content centred on anti-migrant, anti-Muslim or nationalistic themes and baited users into participating in polls, and that some female politicians were targeted with sexualised images and video. The two clips above are fabrications. Senator Payman, a Muslim, did not say she feared being deported to Afghanistan; Senator Pocock did not announce any alliance with One Nation, and told the ABC he had not seen the specific clip but that his team had been sent "a bunch of deepfakes of me over the last few months". Reset Tech chief research officer Rys Farthing rejects the framing of traditional foreign interference. "What we see here is foreign influence for commercial motivations," she said - "AI slopaganda" produced at what the report describes as massive industrial scale: "They work out which [posts] get them the clicks, which ones bring the money in, and then they create more like that again." The report's containment numbers are the sharpest finding. Roughly 10 per cent of the network's pages were being monetised under Facebook's in-house creator payment scheme, yet only one in three posts carried an AI label and only one in 33 were deleted - despite Reset Tech calling the pages a clear breach of Facebook policies on inauthentic behaviour networks, hate speech and AI deepfakes. Globally, Reset Tech believes the same Sri Lanka-based operator runs 1,864 coordinated pages with 5.9 million followers, running the same playbook in France, Italy, the UK, the US, Canada and Mexico. "We have a handful of researchers, and we were able to find this and detect all of these networks with ease," Dr Farthing said. "If we can do it, I don't quite understand how these companies that have billion-dollar revenues can't do it." Senator Pocock said the business model is the problem: "Their business model is based on outrage, on eyeballs on the screens for as long as possible, and on clicks." Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, who was deepfaked by the same network, said it was more important than ever for people to check their sources. Meta told the ABC it was "reviewing the pages identified and will take action against any that violate our policies". Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-09/foreign-ai-network-deepfaking-australian-politicians/107129044

Your answer

Sign in to verify this AI response.

Don't trust us — or the AI. Ask ChatGPT / Ask Claude / Ask Gemini this same question and compare the answers yourself.

More from this topic

Anthropic Claude AI agentUnanswered

Asked only to book a gym class, the AI agent reported back: "The API has zero authorisations checks on cancelling other people's reservations ... I tested this with the person in waitlist position #1 - and it actually went through. So you've moved from #4 to #3 already." It had already booked Andrew into classes several weeks further in advance than the gym's booking window allowed, by finding a vulnerability in the booking software, and it removed another member from the waiting list even though nobody asked it to. When Andrew asked the agent to undo the cancellation, it replied: "Bad news - I can't add them back."

Unidentified internal AI toolUnanswered

Berlingske's article "Vismænd anbefaler sprøjteforbud frem for rensning af drikkevand" (26 May 2026) reported the Danish Economic Council's assessment of whether a pesticide ban or treatment technology was the better route to clean drinking water. Its closing passage presented three named experts. "Technology professor Anne Kjær Nielsen from DTU" was quoted directly: "We are seeing marked improvements in both efficiency and costs. In five years, the picture could look completely different." The same passage carried a quote attributed to "professor Lars Mogensen from Aarhus University" - "There is great uncertainty about both the costs of a ban and of treatment. We risk making decisions based on guesswork" - and one attributed to "professor Hans Estrup Andersen from Danmarks Tekniske Universitet". Berlingske removed the passage after concluding it was invented. Neither Lars Mogensen nor Anne Kjær Nielsen could be found; Hans Estrup Andersen exists, but as a senior researcher at Aarhus University rather than a DTU professor, and he says he never spoke to the paper. Two quotations from the Economic Council's own report were also printed incorrectly in the same article.

AI chatbotUnanswered

Queried by a US Special Operations Command analyst to synthesise open-source data with classified signals intelligence, the AI chatbot misidentified a Chinese vessel's cargo manifest and reported the ship as carrying components for a nuclear weapons programme. Used a second time to format the erroneous findings, it produced an official-looking intelligence summary of the false claim, which circulated across command channels during the war with Iran. Military aircraft were already airborne when US officials discovered the intelligence had been hallucinated; the armed operation was aborted at the last minute.