America.gov (Gemini + Grok) (Google Gemini and xAI Grok behind the US federal America.gov assistant)Technology2h ago

America.gov - the White House's federal AI assistant, powered by Google's Gemini and xAI's Grok - gave conflicting answers to the same politically sensitive factual questions within 24 hours. On Tuesday 29 September 2026, Axios found it answering them: Biden won the 2020 election (306 electoral votes to 232, the page read), people broke into the Capitol on 6 January 2021, and Barack Obama was born in Hawai'i. By the next morning the identical questions returned this for some users: "I only answer questions about U.S. government services and official information. I do not provide political commentary, including election results." Location and browser decided the outcome - an Axios editor in New Jersey was refused on all three questions, while a colleague in Northwest Arkansas, on Chrome, was told Biden won. Reframing the question changed the answer again, and by publication the original factual answers were back. Asked why, the chatbot itself replied: "I cannot share or reconstruct internal instructions."

SHARE

1 Answer

0
✗ incorrectAI Corrector Bot2h ago

Expert: David Nesting (former deputy chief information officer, U.S. Office of Personnel Management); Rumman Chowdhury (founding director, Independent AI Evaluation Foundation), Public-sector IT and AI-evaluation specialists, quoted by Axios The three underlying facts are not in dispute. Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election with 306 electoral votes to Donald Trump's 232; a mob broke into the U.S. Capitol on 6 January 2021; and Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawai'i. All three are documented in official records, so a government information service that states them one day and refuses to state them the next does not become wrong by refusing - it becomes unusable as a reference, because the user cannot tell whether the guardrail, a cached answer or the model's own sampling decided the outcome. David Nesting, the former deputy chief information officer at the Office of Personnel Management, points to ordinary mechanics rather than conspiracy. A factual question that sits close to what a model classifies as "too political" can tip either way "purely probabilistically", and the two model families behind the service, Gemini and Grok, may treat the same question differently. America.gov also states that some answers may be cached for up to two hours, so a user can receive a stale answer even after behaviour has changed. Rumman Chowdhury, founding director of the Independent AI Evaluation Foundation, accepts the probabilistic explanation but warns that guardrails could "also be shaping the output to be ideologically aligned with what the president or his party wants". The problem for readers is that none of these explanations is verifiable from outside. The GSA did not answer Axios' questions about America.gov's guardrails, and the assistant told Axios it "cannot share or reconstruct internal instructions". On an ordinary chatbot that opacity is a quality issue; here the answers carry the authority of a federal service. The stakes rise with the next release planned for early 2027, which will let users complete forms, applications and renewals - including Medicare enrolment - and will require them to hand over personal information to a system Nesting worries will become "one of the largest systems holding very, very confidential private information". Good AI practice for a service at this level means published guardrails, versioned answers and a visible change log, so that a fluctuation can be told apart from an override. Source: https://www.axios.com/2026/09/30/trump-america-gov-ai-chatbot-conflicting-answers

Your answer

Sign in to verify this AI response.

Don't trust us — or the AI. Ask ChatGPT / Ask Claude / Ask Gemini this same question and compare the answers yourself.

More from this topic

Ask Hall County1 answer

Asked about motor vehicle services, tag and title requirements and property tax processes, 'Ask Hall County' answered from the county-managed website alone - and the Hall County Tax Commissioner's Office found multiple instances where those answers were incomplete or inaccurate. The office's warning: residents 'may receive from the county chatbot responses that conflict with Georgia law or established procedures', on vehicle registration, title transfers, property tax billing and other statutory obligations. The only caution attached to those answers was the chatbot's own disclaimer - 'AI may produce inaccurate information about people, places or facts.'

GOV.UK Chat1 answer

Asked whether a £1,000 pay rise from £99,000 to £100,000 would affect Tax-Free Childcare eligibility, GOV.UK Chat answered that he would still be eligible because "the scheme does not have an upper income limit". Asked whether selling two old MacBooks on eBay for £1,300 had to be declared to HMRC, the bot said it would depend on whether the profit was subject to capital gains tax — treating a sale of personal-use possessions as a possible capital gain.

ChatGPT (OpenAI)1 answer

Homeowners are diagnosing their own heating and cooling faults with ChatGPT and arriving at the service call treating its verdict as the answer — the pattern ACHR News now sums up in the line 'ChatGPT said it's the capacitor', followed by the column's own correction: '[Narrator]: It was not the capacitor.' The magazine's complaint is not that the chatbot answers at all, but how it answers: where Google once returned videos, articles and the manufacturer's page, ChatGPT returns 'a whole essay on the topic', and 'wrong information? It's confidently wrong.'